When Students Struggle in Clinical: Becoming a Coach for Your NP Students
- Jacklyn DelPrete
- Feb 23
- 3 min read

Every NP faculty member has had this moment.
You’re reviewing a clinical evaluation, or you get that email from a preceptor that starts with, “I’m a little concerned…” Or maybe you see it yourself during site visits—the hesitation, the missed cues, the student who just isn’t connecting the dots.
Is this a learning gap, or is this something more?
When students struggle in clinical, it can feel personal. We worry about patient safety. We worry about fairness. We worry about whether we missed something earlier. And if we’re honest, we sometimes worry about how much time and emotional energy this is about to take.
The instinct is often to either tighten control or pull back completely. More paperwork. More warnings. Or, on the other end, quietly hope that things will somehow improve on their own. Coaching lives in the middle, and that’s where the real work happens.
One of the most important shifts is reframing what “struggling” actually means. Clinical difficulty rarely shows up as a single catastrophic failure. It’s usually patterns:
Slow clinical reasoning. Difficulty prioritizing. Trouble synthesizing information into a plan. Confidence that doesn’t match competence—or competence that’s buried under anxiety.
Before jumping to conclusions, it helps to slow down and get specific. Like in nursing practice, you must assess first and gather information before you can intervene and develop a plan.
“Not doing well in clinical” isn’t actionable. “Has difficulty generating differential diagnoses without prompting” is. The more concrete you can be about what you’re seeing, the easier it becomes to coach. You'll need to reach out to the preceptor directly since they are spending the most time in the clinical space with the student. Clinical evaluation forms are definitely a helpful tool and critical documentation element, but include specific instances of the clinical concerns whenever possible.
Then, approach the student. Don't come after them with "Your preceptor said this..." or "You really had trouble with this diagnosis." Go to the student with a positive approach and with the sense of wanting to help them (because isn't that the ultimate goal?).
Coaching starts with curiosity. Asking students to talk through their thinking (out loud, in real time) often reveals far more than written evaluations ever will. You begin to see whether the issue is knowledge gaps, clinical reasoning, communication, or self-trust. Most of the time, it’s not that the student doesn’t care or isn’t trying. It’s that they don’t yet know how to think like a clinician under pressure.
This is where faculty can make a huge difference. Students who struggle often need structure more than discipline. Clear expectations. Fewer moving parts. A predictable framework for patient encounters. When everything feels overwhelming, simplifying the process can unlock progress surprisingly fast.
Feedback matters here—but not the kind that lives only on evaluation forms. Coaching feedback is specific, timely, and focused on growth. Instead of “needs to be more confident,” try “I noticed you had the right assessment, but you hesitated to commit to a plan. Let’s work on how to verbalize that next time.” That kind of feedback gives students something concrete to practice.
It’s also important to separate coaching from rescuing. Supporting a struggling student does not mean lowering standards or doing the thinking for them. It means guiding them to develop skills they haven’t yet mastered. Sometimes that includes uncomfortable conversations about readiness, pace, or fit.
And then there’s the emotional side, for both faculty and students. Clinical struggles often trigger shame in students and frustration in faculty. Naming that tension can be surprisingly powerful. When students feel seen as learners rather than problems to manage, defensiveness drops and engagement improves. When faculty allow themselves to acknowledge that this work is hard, that struggle softens just a little.
Not every struggling student will ultimately succeed in clinical practice, and that reality matters too. Coaching isn’t about guaranteeing outcomes. It’s about ensuring that decisions are fair, thoughtful, and grounded in observed performance. You also need to be aware of any policies in your institution such as learning contracts or probationary periods. Again, those should not be used as punishment, but rather a way to outline a path to success AND serve as a way to guard against grievances should the student not succeed.
At its best, clinical coaching is one of the most meaningful roles faculty play. You’re not just evaluating performance; you’re shaping how future NPs learn to think, respond to feedback, and navigate uncertainty. Even when the outcome is difficult, students will remember being coached with clarity and respect.
_edited.jpg)



Comments