Student Evaluations of Teaching: What NP Faculty Should Do When the Feedback Hurts

You finished the semester. You gave it everything you had with discussion board interactions, carefully scaffolded assignments, recorded lectures you re-recorded three times because the audio quality was off. And then the evaluations dropped.

"The course was disorganized." "The instructor wasn't helpful." "I didn't feel supported."

If you've ever stared at comments like those and felt a wave of shame, defensiveness, or just plain hurt wash over you — you are not alone.

A 2022 article published in Medical Education Online titled "When Students' Words Hurt: 12 Tips for Helping Faculty Receive and Respond Constructively to Student Evaluations of Teaching" by Cornes and colleagues offers evidence-based guidance for exactly this moment. I'm breaking down their key recommendations here through the lens of NP faculty life, because this research is too good not to keep sharing.

Student evaluations of teaching are a reality of faculty life, but even constructively worded critical feedback can produce real emotional pain. That's not weakness. That's a completely normal human response to having your professional work judged, often anonymously, by people you've been pouring effort into helping.

But those feelings, left unexamined, can actually get in the way of your growth as an educator. And you deserve better than that. So let's talk about what the evidence says — and what you can actually do — when student words land hard.

---

First, Understand Why This Hurts So Much

The sting of a harsh evaluation isn't random. Faculty often interpret evaluation feedback as a judgment not just on their teaching ability, but on their personal and professional identity. When you've built your career around being a competent, caring clinician and now educator, a comment that challenges that identity doesn't just feel like feedback, it can feel like an attack on who you are.

Add to that the reality of our current moment. Faculty are navigating concerns about burnout alongside repeated demands to adapt curricula, teaching formats, and content, and many NP programs are still finding their footing in hybrid and asynchronous delivery. In that context, the risk of a harsh evaluation hitting harder than it should is very real.

Knowing why it hurts doesn't make it hurt less, but it does give you a starting point for moving through it.

---

5 Evidence-Based Strategies for Moving Forward

1. Control When and How You Read Them

This sounds small, but it matters. Faculty can usually prepare by controlling the time and place in which they review them. Before reading them, also check in on whether you are experiencing other feelings that might interfere, like being hungry, angry, lonely, or tired. Set yourself up to receive feedback when you're in a regulated, grounded state.

2. Name the Type of Trigger You're Experiencing

When a comment lands hard, pause before reacting. Faculty can reflect on whether a comment is functioning as a truth trigger (it feels inaccurate or discountable), a relationship trigger (you're questioning the intent or credibility of the feedback giver), or an identity trigger (the feedback feels threatening to how you see yourself).

This kind of awareness is powerful. When you can name what's being activated, you can see past it to the actual growth opportunity (instead of getting stuck in a loop of dismissal or self-doubt).

3. Don't Skip the Positives

I get it. The negative comments are magnetic. They can draw your focus more than a glowing review sometimes. But some faculty tend to attribute disproportionate weight to critical comments while discounting positive ones. That kind of imbalance can lock faculty into a state where it becomes harder to draw meaning from experiences or continue to improve.

Make it a habit to read and genuinely sit with positive feedback first. What went well? What are students finding valuable? Reflecting on reinforcing feedback can help faculty maintain a positive outlook and a continued growth mindset — and may even illuminate a strategy for addressing an area that needs growth.

4. Examine the Learning Context Before Drawing Conclusions

Before you decide that a critical comment means you need to overhaul everything, take a minute to look at the whole picture.

Ask yourself these questions:

• Did something change upstream in the curriculum that made your course suddenly harder to navigate?

• Are students evaluating a topic that they'll only appreciate later in the program?

The introduction of an innovation may create growing pains that lead to learner frustration, but that's not the same as pedagogical failure.

5. Triangulate Before You Act

One evaluation cycle is one data point. Before taking action, look at additional data sources — including learning outcome data from assessments, peer observation or coaching, and informal discussion with a colleague or mentor who can provide an additional perspective.

Look at your students' actual performance data — did they demonstrate mastery of the content, even if they didn't enjoy how it was delivered? Does the feedback align with something you already knew needed attention, or does it feel completely disconnected from your experience of the course?

---

What NOT to Do

• Don't make sweeping changes just to silence criticism. Faculty may introduce unjustified changes into their teaching merely to please students. Responsiveness to feedback is good, but capitulating to every unhappy comment is not. Your pedagogical judgment matters.

• Don't let learner satisfaction scores become the whole story. Learner satisfaction should not be interpreted as the sole marker of a faculty member's pedagogical competence, and research has shown that faculty who challenge their learners or provide needed constructive feedback may actually receive lower scores. A high-rigor course is not a failed course.

• Don't read evaluations in isolation. Your students are one voice (albeit an important one), but student evaluations have known limitations including threats to validity, sources of bias, and conflation with learner satisfaction. A single harsh comment from one student is not a referendum on your worth as an educator.

---

Close the Loop With Intention

After you've reflected, contextualized, and gathered additional data, there's one more essential step: faculty should close the loop on the feedback with a focus on learning and learner agency. This means communicating actions being taken when next steps are clear, and inviting ongoing conversation when they're not.

This is actually an opportunity. Consider discussing with students even just at the start of the next course with the same cohort or at the start of the next iteration of a course about changes or improvements made. By acknowledging that you heard their feedback and here's what you're trying differently, you're modeling the exact growth mindset we want our future NPs to bring to clinical practice. You're demonstrating that feedback is a tool, not a verdict.

---

A Note on the Hard Stuff

Sometimes evaluations surface something real. Maybe the course was confusing. Maybe your presence in the discussion board was inconsistent that semester. Maybe you were stretched too thin. That's okay to acknowledge.

Elevation as a faculty member isn't about having perfect evaluations. It's about building the capacity to receive hard feedback without either crumbling or dismissing it. It’s to hold it, examine it honestly, and decide what it means for your practice.

---

Source:

Cornes, S., Torre, D., Fulton, T. B., Oza, S., Teherani, A., & Chen, H. C. (2022). When students' words hurt: 12 tips for helping faculty receive and respond constructively to student evaluations of teaching. Medical Education Online, 28(1), 2154768. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9733684/

Jacklyn DelPrete, EdD, CRNP, FNP-C is a family nurse practitioner, full-time graduate nursing faculty member, and founder of The Elevated NP. Questions or topics you'd like covered? Reach out at elevatednpteam@gmail.com.